May 23, 2012, 01:36:28 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Let's Talk Beatles!
Do you have a question or something you'd like to share? Please join one of our many threads or create your own and enjoy a good-hearted conversation or debate with other memebers of this board.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Pages: [1]
  Print  
Author Topic: VERY BAD NEWS!  (Read 163 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
Derek
The Beatles
****
Posts: 386



WWW
« on: November 25, 2011, 08:02:05 AM »

http://www.side-line.com/news_comments.php?id=46980_0_2_0_C
Can they wait at least until i have my "Ram (Deluxe Edition)" on CD which is supposed to be released anytime now!?  cutevil cutevil
« Last Edit: November 25, 2011, 08:06:49 AM by Derek » Logged
2 of 3
Global Moderator
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1758



« Reply #1 on: November 25, 2011, 06:19:14 PM »

It would be nice if they replace the CD with a download that is the same quality as a CD. I mean, downloaded stuff doesn't sound as "full" to me....or is it just ME?
Logged

It's Better to have No Taste, than Bad Taste.
chris
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 587



« Reply #2 on: November 25, 2011, 06:58:34 PM »

i wouldn't sweat this. it seems like a crock. until you hear record labels saying they aren't doing it anymore, i would expect it to be continued to be done.

i still buy cd's. my kids download music. what i buy sounds much better than what they buy.
Logged

sometimes i'd rather run and hide...than stay to face the fear inside...
mervap
Administrator
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1965



« Reply #3 on: November 25, 2011, 07:20:14 PM »

It wouldn't surprise me in the least to see this happen...it would be an easy (for them) way to reduce overhead costs. I agree with you all: Downloaded music still doesn't sound as rich as CDs, and THEY don't sound as good as clean vinyl...
Logged

"If Love is blind, how will it ever find a way?"
Kylenz
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1182



« Reply #4 on: November 27, 2011, 06:06:26 PM »

It would be nice if they replace the CD with a download that is the same quality as a CD. I mean, downloaded stuff doesn't sound as "full" to me....or is it just ME?

To be honest, I haven't listened to cds since probably the year 1999. Every cd I've bought, gets ripped to my computer and gathers dust on the shelf from that day forward.

I agree about the sound quality of downloads. You can blame iTunes for this. AAC format is horrible. It's not as good as a 320k mp3, which even then, is not the best sound quality you can have.

So then you get these FLAC formats, which are supposedly lossless (even though they are still compressed) and you still can't play them on an Ipod, nor can you play them on good ol' Windows Media Player without getting some weird codec for it first.

It would be better for everybody if they simply released music via the original WAV files direct from the studio masters, and then you could convert it into whichever digital format you prefer. While also, providing alternative download options (mp3, aac etc) for those with slower or heavily-capped broadband connections.

I'm not going to lament the loss of the cd. It never sounded as good as vinyl anyway. They always got scratched even though they were originally billed as indestructible - that you could eat your dinner off them. The amount of cds I've lost due to 'cd rot' is crazy (including my 'Beatles For Sale' 1987 mono). And the album art never looked as good on a cd compared to a record. Cds really are a pain in the neck these days with all the shelf space you need to house them. It's just so much easier having them all on your pc as a one-stop jukebox, perfectly tagged with album art and all the genre/year details etc. Back the whole lot up with an external hard drive the size of your hand, rather than carting boxes and boxes of the darned things and sitting on shelves doing nothing.
Logged
2 of 3
Global Moderator
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1758



« Reply #5 on: November 27, 2011, 07:08:34 PM »

Way back when, you know...when I had a pet dinosaur...I used to buy the audiophile series of whom ever I was into at the time. They were vinyl albums, but in GOLD writing it said..bla bla bla...studio master tapes..bla bla bla...limited pressing..what ever...they cost like $40 bucks..but holy moly, they sound like what could only have been God's personal stereo system blasting from heaven. I was hoping CD's would sound this good, but it's not even close. MP3 is weird...I mean, it's dang handy, but it sure isn't for people who care about sound quality. Was there ever an Audiphile Series of CD's? It used to be that having an amazing stereo was the way to go. Now, just jam an earbud into your cranium and that's good enough.
 
Logged

It's Better to have No Taste, than Bad Taste.
Kylenz
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1182



« Reply #6 on: November 28, 2011, 02:00:51 AM »

That's right, it's all going backwards, nobody cares about sound quality anymore.

I kinda think of the mp3 as the modern equivalent of a dubbed tape. The mp3 is 'good enough', and doesn't have all the hiss that tapes used to have. I'd rather have the mp3 anyday.

Or maybe my ears simply don't care anymore?!  crazy
Logged
Pages: [1]
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!