May 23, 2012, 04:04:25 PM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: Welcome to Let's Talk Beatles!
Do you have a question or something you'd like to share? Please join one of our many threads or create your own and enjoy a good-hearted conversation or debate with other memebers of this board.
 
   Home   Help Login Register  
Beatles Forums | Beatles Message Boards | Beatles Talk | Fab Four | Beatles Blogs > Paul McCartney Forums > All Paul - General Discussions > Should Paul have been there instead of Jimmy Page?
Pages: [1]
« previous next »
  Print  
Author Topic: Should Paul have been there instead of Jimmy Page?  (Read 108 times)
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.
2 of 3
Global Moderator
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1760
« on: August 25, 2008, 05:23:34 PM »
During the closing ceremony of the Olympics, Jimmy Page was brought on as part of the "pass the baton" to London segment.  They performed Whole Lotta Love. Strange don't you think? I wonder if Macca was asked?
Logged
It's Better to have No Taste, than Bad Taste.
mervap
Administrator
The Threetles
*****
Posts: 1965
« Reply #1 on: August 25, 2008, 05:46:47 PM »
Isn't Jimmy from London? Maybe geographically more appropriate? Dunno...
Logged
"If Love is blind, how will it ever find a way?"
Pages: [1]
  Print  
« previous next »
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.4 | SMF © 2006-2007, Simple Machines LLC Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!